Cutty Sark Restoration – Greenwich London

The incredible Cutty Sark

One day my grandfather George Garrett mentioned Hercules Linton was my grt grt grt grt Grandgfather and he just happened to design and make one of the finest clippers in the world: The Cutty Sark

Only recently has that sunk in!

In 2000 I visited my aunty Margaret on the Isle of Wight ”Yes indeed Nick… he is your family… it’s true, Hercules Linton”

So here is an article about this incredible ship.

Nick Garrett – Desight

This article is about the ship.
The Cutty Sark in Greenwich, London, UK
Image via Wikipedia

Cutty Sark in dock, Greenwich – January 2005

Career (UK) UK Civil Ensign
Name: Cutty Sark (1869-95), (1922-date)
Namesake: Cutty-sark
Ordered: 1868
Builder: Scott & Linton
Laid down: 1869
Launched: 22 November 1869
Sponsored by: Mrs. Moodie
Christened: 22 November 1869
Commissioned: 16 February 1870
In service: February 1870
Out of service: December 1954
Homeport: London (1870-1895)
Falmouth (1923-38)
London (1938-date)
Identification: UK Official Number: 63557[1]
Motto: “Where there’s a will is a way”
Status: Museum ship
Career (Portugal) Flag Portugal sea (1830).svg Flag of Portugal.svg
Name: Ferreira
Namesake: Joaquim Antunes Ferreira
Owner: Joaquim Antunes Ferreira & Co.
Acquired: 22 July 1895
Homeport: LisbonPortugal
Nickname: Pequena Camisola (“Little shirt”)
Fate: Refitted
Career (Portugal) Flag of Portugal.svg
Name: Maria do Amparo
Acquired: 1916
Homeport: LisbonPortugal
Fate: Sold
General characteristics
Class and type: Clipper
Tonnage: 975 GRT[1]
Displacement: 2,100 tons (2,133.7 tonnes) at 20 ft (6.1 m) draught
Length: Hull: 212 ft 5 in (64.74 m)
LOA: 280 ft (85.34 m)
Beam: 36 ft (10.97 m)
Speed: 17.15 kn (31.76 km/h)
Capacity: 1,700 tons (1542 tonnes)
Complement: 28-35

The Cutty Sark is a clipper ship. Built in 1869, she served as a merchant vessel (the last clipper to be built for that purpose), and then as a training ship until being put on public display in 1954. She is preserved in dry dock in GreenwichLondon.

Cutty Sark is one of only three ships in London on the Core Collection of the National Historic Ships Register (the nautical equivalent of a Grade 1 Listed Building) – alongside HMS Belfast and SS Robin.

Badly damaged by fire on 21 May 2007 while undergoing conservation, the vessel is being restored and is expected to reopen in 2012.[2] TheCutty Sark is one of only three remaining original composite construction (wooden hull on an iron frame) clipper ships from the nineteenth century in part or whole, the others being the City of Adelaide, awaiting transportation to Australia for preservation, and the beached skeleton ofAmbassador of 1869 near Punta Arenas, Chile.



[edit]Construction and etymology

Cutty Sark under sail

The Cutty Sark was designed by Hercules Linton and built in 1869 at DumbartonScotland, by the firm of Scott & Linton, for Captain John “Jock” “White Hat” Willis expressly to outsail the clipperThermopylae.[3] Her planking, deadwoodsstem and sternpost were of American rock elm, secured by brass bolts to an internal iron frame.[4] The original keel was also rock elm and 17 inches (43 cm) thick, but was replaced in the 1920s with one constructed from 15 inches (38 cm) pitch pine.[4] Her length was 212 feet 5 inches (64.74 m) with a draft of 21 feet (6.40 m) and a deadweight of 921 tons.[5]

She was named after Cutty Sark (Scots: a short chemise or undergarment[6]), the nickname of the fictional character Nannie Dee in Robert Burns‘ 1791 poem Tam o’ Shanter. She is also represented as Nannie Dee by the ship’s figurehead, a stark white carving of a bare-breasted woman with long black hair holding a grey horse’s tail in her hand. In the poem she wore a linen sark that she had been given as a child, which explains why it was cutty, or in other words far too short, for her. Theerotic sight of her dancing in such a short undergarment caused Tam to cry out “Weel done, Cutty-sark”, which subsequently became a well known catchphrase.


The Cutty Sark was launched on 22 November 1869, and after Scott & Linton was liquidated she was completed by William Denny & Brothersfor John Willis & Son.[7]

Cutty Sark was destined for the tea trade, then an intensely competitive race across the globe from China to London, with a substantial bonus to the ship to arrive with the first tea of the year. In the most famous race, against Thermopylae in 1872, both ships left Shanghai together on 18 June, but two weeks later Cutty Sark lost her rudder after passing through the Sunda Strait, and arrived in London on 18 October, a week afterThermopylae, a total passage of 122 days. Her legendary reputation is supported by the fact that her captain chose to continue this race with an improvised rudder instead of putting into port for a replacement, yet was beaten by only one week.

In 1890, she was taken out of the tea races and cut down to save money for general cargo carrying. The life of a sailor on fast sailing ships was no picnic at the best of times, but the incredible events of her next voyage, 1890–1891, occupy an entire chapter in “The Log of the Cutty Sark” (Basil Lubbock, 1924) and formed the base of Joseph Conrad‘s “The Secret Sharer” — a mate so brutal the London crew deserted at first port leaving only the bound apprentices; a superb captain who drove his ship just short of 2,000 km in 72 hours, but committed suicide when the crew mutinied after he allowed the mate to escape after killing one of them; a stop in the shadow of Krakatoa only two years before it exploded; a replacement captain and mate who were each worse than the original mate even when sober; four months ashore at Calcutta over Christmas; cholera; a second mutiny in all but name; another murder by the new mate; and running out of provisions.[8]

She recovered her reputation under Captain Richard Woodget, winning the wool race 10 years out of 10 (and beating Thermopylae every time they met[citation needed]). She posted Australia-to-Britain times of as little as 67 days, and in one instance outsailed the fastest steamship there was then, RMS Britannia. Her best run, 360 nmi (670 km) in 24 hours (an average 15 kn (28 km/h)), was said to have been the fastest of any ship of her size.

In the end, of course, clippers lost out to steamships, which could pass through the recently opened Suez Canal and deliver goods more reliably, if not quite so quickly, which proved to be better for business. So, in 1895 Willis sold her to the Portuguese firm Ferreira and she was renamed Ferreira after the firm, although her crews referred to her as Pequena Camisola (“little shirt”, a straight translation of the Scots “cutty sark”).[9] In 1916 she was dismasted off the Cape of Good Hope, sold, re-rigged in Cape Town as a barquentine, and renamed Maria do Amparo. In 1922 she was bought in Lisbon by Captain Wilfred Dowman, of Trevissome HouseFlushingCornwall. He rescued her for the nation, towing her back from Spain and keeping her at anchor in Falmouth harbour. Captain Dowman restored the ship to a close approximation of her appearance as a tea and wool clipper. This was a considerable feat, due to the shortage of necessary materials caused by the First World War. She was also the first historic vessel since Drake’s Golden Hind in the sixteenth century to be opened to the public, and oral history interviews have revealed how boatmen used to take many visitors out to the ship. Cutty Sark was used as a cadet training ship, where half a dozen boys from different backgrounds would live on board and train for a career in either the Royal Navy or the Merchant Marine. However, Captain Dowman died in 1936, and his widow decided that she was unable to maintain the ship at her own cost. Therefore, Cutty Sark was sold to the Incorporated Thames Nautical Training College, Greenhithe, and left Falmouth in 1938 accompanied by cheers from well-wishers and hoots from vessels in the harbour. This was the last time that she went to sea. Ian Bryce, DSC, the last surviving crew member on the historic tow from Falmouth to the Thames died, aged 89, on 11 December 2011.[10].

HNSA Crest with photos of visitors at the ships.
 HNSA Ships to Visit: Listed by Location Listed by Name Listed by Type Overnight Programs Find Ships With a Map  Knowledge Base: How to Find Ship Info Manuals & Documents Historic Sound & Video Operations Handbook  About HNSA: Associate Members Introduction Activities Membership Donate Anchorwatch Newsletter Job Postings Awards Bylaws Contact HNSA Search  Support HNSA: Membership Donate

The Cutty Sark,
The Trials and Tribulations of a Restoration Project

Wyn Davies, Senior Consultant,
Frazer-Nash Consultancy Ltd.,
Bristol, UK.

Painting of Cutty Sark under sail.


1. Introduction
2. History of the Cutty Sark
3. Importance of the Vessel
4. Current State of the Vessel
5. The Action Plan
6. The Team
7. Defining the Problem
8. The Deck
9. The Trials
10. The Way Ahead
11. Acknowledgements
12. Author


This paper covers the work being done on the clipper Cutty Sark to determine exactly the state of the ship’s structure and the methods available to ensure this structure survives for the foreseeable future.

It covers the findings of a very complete survey carried out in 1997, the on going trials and experiments all directed at specifying the work needed to refurbish the ship, ranging from electrolytic treatment of corroded metals to the search for a politically suitable source of hardwood for the upper deck. From the high tech, finite element analysis of the ship’s structure to the tested and traditional techniques of the shipwright.

The paper covers a lot of work already completed, but it is as nothing, however, compared with the work to be done once the team get the funds. But it is to be hoped that, as a result of all this work, theCutty Sark will still be seen over the roofs of Greenwich for some time to come.

1. Introduction

This paper covers the work being done on the clipper Cutty Sark to determine exactly the state of the ship’s structure and the methods available to ensure this structure survives for the foreseeable future.

It covers the findings of a very complete survey carried out in 1997, the on going trials and experiments all directed at specifying the work needed to refurbish the ship. It is intended to be a fairly wide ranging paper, detailed descriptions of some of the techniques are available from the various papers, publications and conservation documents referenced below.

The author’s personal involvement with the ship goes back several years, whilst employed by Three Quays Marine Services, and started in earnest in 1995 with the management of a full survey and the technical support for the owner’s unsuccessful application to the UK’s Heritage Lottery Fund (the lottery) for a large sum of money to make good the structure.

This paper will also try to cover some of the reasons for that lack of success and the steps that have been taken to get the accurate costings that have gone into the latest application to the lottery.

Although part of the overall restoration project, this paper will not cover the civil engineering work that has gone on in parallel. Suffice it to say that there are likely to be some very innovative ideas proposed for the support of the vessel and its visitor infrastructure.

2. History of the Cutty Sark

The sailing vessel Cutty Sark owes her existence to the Chinese tea trade. Although tea had been exported to England since the 1660s, the nineteenth century manifestation of the trade was the result of the forcing open of the Chinese ports to Western ships, achieved by way of the infamous Opium Wars.

The Treaty of Nanking signed in 1842 opened Canton, Amoy, Foochow, Ningpo and Shanghai to free trade, while the Treaty of Tientsin signed in 1858 after the second Anglo-Chinese War opened up ports on the Yangtze. The most important of these was Hankow, 586 miles up the Yangtze.

The result was an explosion in the amount of tea exported. In 1834 Britain imported 33.6 million lbs of tea; the following year it increased to 44.3 million lbs. With the repeal of the Navigation Laws (which allowed only British ships to unload at British ports) in 1849, this rose to 55.5 million lbs.

The demand for tea never seemed to be satisfied – merchants could sell without difficulty. However, it became the fashion to drink the freshest tea and particularly from the first ship to arrive with that season’s cargo. This therefore created a demand for ever-faster ships, not ones with enormous carrying capacity.

This was to result in the clipper ship, a form originally developed in the United States but copied and improved upon by the British. Over 80 clippers were built in the short period between 1853 and 1870, although never more than sixty at any one time.1

3. Importance of the Vessel

She is the world’s sole surviving extreme clipper, a type of vessel that was the highest development of the fast commercial sailing ship, with the majority of her hull fabric surviving from her original construction.

Her fine lines – a considerable part of her appeal – are defined by her frames which form part of the vessel’s composite construction, a construction technique of which she is the best surviving example and of which she is of exceptional quality.

As a tea clipper, she was a participant in a significant chapter in 19th century trade and cultural life.2

Significantly she is the only vessel in England that was given a listing by English Heritage. This is intended to serve in some way as protection and is usually applied to buildings of significance in the UK. As English Heritage doesn’t have a great deal of money, the protection is unfortunately sometimes in name only.

This also brings with it more than a few do’s and don’ts with regard to how you treat the structure in question, but which can be summarized as “use as much original material as possible and don’t do anything irreversible”.

4. Current State of the Vessel

To bring the story up to date, the typical visitor will be aware that the ship was preserved for the nation and as a memorial to merchant seamen in 1957. She resides in a purpose built dry dock, which she moved into in 1955, near the Royal Naval Hospital, now the University of Greenwich, at Greenwich on the river Thames.

The typical visitor would no doubt be familiar with this picture of the old lady:

Painting of Cutty Sark under sail.

They would not, however, be so familiar with this view of the floors in the hold. These are in fact below the false deck added to aid access to the hold in 1955, so admittedly not readily visible to the visitors.

Photo of floor with hole rotted through.

Most of the illustrations included in this paper are from the large number taken during the survey carried out in 1996, some of which needed the use of an hydraulic platform and a good head for heights. This is well illustrated by this aerial photograph of the whole ship.

Photo of from above looking down on the foredeck and foremast.

It is appropriate to cover the masts and rigging at this point. Very little of these are original, although it is believed that the lower masts may be. All the masts, spars and rigging have been renovated and renewed relatively recently and do not present a problem except to note that the fore and main masts are supported directly off the concrete central plinth below the keel.

By way of illustrating the good standards achieved aloft the following illustration is of the mizzen top rebuilt in 1996.

Photo of mizzen top.

Returning again to the ship, most visitors would recognize this display of figureheads in the hold:

Photo in hold showing figureheads.

But how many would recognize this?

Photo of steel rusting with failing paint.

This is one example of the corrosion damage, rust flaking off a stringer plate behind the figureheads. The whole of the wrought iron structure is suffering from corrosion and decay to a greater or lesser extent. As is only to be expected this corrosion is causing pressure between iron surfaces, which could lead joints to fail, bolts to snap and the overall structure to become unsafe.

To complete the picture a brief word about her construction would be appropriate.

Drawing of a cross section of the ship

Elevation showing typical portion of the arrangement of side diagnonal tie plates.

These two figures show the wrought iron framed timber planked composite construction. Composite construction was used for some time, but wrought iron was rapidly replaced with steel as soon as production advances made it cheap enough. Thus the Cutty Sark is one of quite a small group to start with – although the UK actually has three survivors of this small group – HMS GannetCity of Adelaide and of course Cutty Sark.

In addition to the wrought iron and timber, her lower hull is sheathed in a form of bronze, known as Muntz metal – not copper, too expensive for mere merchant ships! Whilst its main function is to deter fouling of the hull this sheathing is arranged not to let water in, nor, as it transpired, to let it out.

Photo of plank with bolt.

The planks are held in place by Muntz metal bolts, with the wrought iron giving a perfect combination of metals for electrolytic corrosion when wet. As a result of this electrolytic action, timber adjacent to the iron also shows signs of electrolytic decay, softening to the point where a knife point can pushed in easily.

In the Cutty Sark‘s design, rock elm was used below the water line (simplistically speaking) and teak above. Elm does not normally survive for long out of water, another area of concern to be checked.

The source of all these problems can in almost all cases be directly attributed to rain leaking through the main deck. The main deck is believed to mainly consist of a triple sandwich, designed to represent the original deck when viewed from either above or below. It is believed that it even includes some roofing felt. Whilst it is difficult to find the source of a leak in a “normal” sandwich deck, it is virtually impossible with Cutty Sark‘s arrangement.

The result of this leak was bilges filling up with rain (and, unfortunately, wash down water) which was trapped in by the sheathing, the keel area was permanently water logged and the chlorides left in the structure from her years of service were reactivated with a vengeance.

Once Simon Waite, her then master, made the discovery in the early 90’s, he removed the Muntz metal at the keel to allow the water to drain out and happily most of the keel and false keel dried out, although some replacement was necessary at the time and more is likely to be required now.

A view of the keel on the concrete plinth showing the gaps in the sheathing..
A view of the keel on the concrete plinth showing the gaps in the sheathing.

This is the keel and false keel after drying out.
This is the keel and false keel after drying out.

5. The Action Plan

This sorry state of affairs was well documented by the survey report of 1997, in which the author went on record to say that the ship would become too dangerous to allow the public on board within 10 years if nothing was done to make good the ravages of time.

The first attempt at gaining financial support was, as noted above, unsuccessful. It had been felt that a period of experimentation and planning was necessary to establish final costs, but the Trust were encouraged to put a full application into the “lottery” without these figures. A mistake on everyone’s part as it transpired.

To prevent a similar occurrence, teams of specialists were assembled under the new chief executive of the Trust, Richard Doughty, tasked with going forward to a new application to the “lottery”.

6. The Team

The experts came from many walks of life, but this paper will be confined to the technical and historical side of the work.

Input came from a variety of places, the Universities of Portsmouth and Greenwich, Hampshire County Council Museums Services, from shipbuilders, suppliers and from several consultants with specialist knowledge. Each will be acknowledged somewhere in the next sections when their contribution is discussed.

7. Defining the Problem

To ensure that the costs that went into the lottery bid were as accurate as possible we needed to resolve a number of issues. The team had to determine the best method for removing the corrosion from as much of the structure as possible, to determine the cost of replacing planks (having removed them carefully in the first place!), the most appropriate timber to be used, but perhaps most importantly, how strong was the surviving structure?

8. The Deck

The problem of the “leaking roof” is relatively straightforward to solve and it will be replaced with one identical to that originally designed for the ship. Work is now progressing to find a source of suitable teak.

The wood has to be mechanically suitable, environmentally acceptable and without political taint! Technically Burmese teak would be best, but whilst this might have been acceptable a few years ago, and indeed has good, but unrecognised environmental credentials, it is no longer acceptable for such a high profile project. The search continues.

Corrosion shown from below the deck.
Typical corrosion damage beneath the main deck.

A view from the poop looking forward.
A view from the poop looking forward.

9. The Trails

Peter Lawton from Hampshire County Council Museum Services had almost perfected an electrolysis process that removes or makes inert corrosion products. It involves using a weak alkaline solution, PH 7 – 8, with an anode of titanium or stainless steel mesh held just off the hull. The metal hull acts as the cathode. A current is then put through the system, which strips off corrosion and paint alike. This was used successfully on the First World War 6 inch monitor, M33, an all-metal ship built in 1915 for service in the Dardanelles.

Photo of M33 in graving dock.

An interior view showing flooded area with bubble comming up.
This view shows the process well underway, with visible production of hydrogen bubbles.

A view of metal mesh anodes.
This illustrates a typical set up for the anodes in M33.

Early attempts to apply it to samples of iron and wood from the Cutty Sark resulted in the wood disintegrating – a bit of a disadvantage! Happily it was at this point that Portsmouth University became involved and after some initial work, led by Dr Sheelagh Campbell and Dr Iwona Beech, determined that the addition of a biocide would solve what turns out to be a microbial problem.

Tests were carried out at the university to determine the exact level of biocide – too high and it becomes toxic waste with all the concomitant disposal problems, too low and there is a danger of losing the wood and metal to the microbes.

At this point in time it is intended to use this technique in the bilge area where the structure is badly contaminated with chlorides and likely to be very difficult to dismantle successfully.

To confirm its suitability Portsmouth University recently ran an experiment in the stern peak of the ship. Obviously it was not possible to remove the planks for this experiment and had the experiment team had to spend a considerable time stopping up leaks as the caulking was obviously not water tight any longer, a finding confirmed by the next experiment.

The results of this experiment were very encouraging; the timbers did not go soft and about 1lb of sodium chloride was extracted during a 23 day experimental period from an experiment which lasted about six weeks.

The next figure illustrates the relative cleanliness of the wrought iron structure after the experiment, with but a few discoloured patches remaining awaiting the high pressure wash down.

Photo of clean structure.

One of the side effects is shown in this figure. Copper salts, iron oxide compounds and the pale sand used to try and stop up the leaks combined to produce a colourful finish to the sheathing wherever the leaks came out. It should be noted, however, that water rich in iron, which reduces pH, may adversely affect metals it comes into contact with.

A side view of the multicolored sheathing.

This experiment has also allowed the university team to provide a detailed quotation for the refit work.

Higher up the ship’s structure, as noted, the refit will have to completely replace the deck planking and there is a choice between removing side planking and cleaning the wrought iron mechanically, or vice versa, removing frames, cleaning them and replacing them. It is believed that may also be necessary to replace some of the more degraded planks at this stage.

To check on the cost of this process, and to gain some more information on the state of the ship’s timbers, Tommi Nielsen of Gloucester was contracted to remove one plank. The elm plank selected was one that crossed a large number of wrought iron members, thus it was probably one of the weakest. Tommi and his team did a splendid job, and the ship now has a hole in the port side and the team has possession of one slightly ratty plank.

Replaced plank on lacy structure.

Removed plank.

The team learned several things from this exercise.

The plank was basically intact and seem to have retained a degree of strength beyond expected for its species. Possibly due to being pickled by salt.

The caulking had dried to the point where it served only as a draft excluder, revealing that the planks were still separate and weren’t carrying any load, a possibility that had concerned the author ever since first seeing the corroded wrought iron.

Only something like 12% of the bolts were intact and serving their intended function. They would have to be replaced throughout, but to keep English Heritage satisfied it is proposed to melt down the old bolts and re-use the metal.

The time and effort from this work were scaled up to give a reasonable cost for work similar work throughout the whole ship.

Still concerned about the residual strength of the degraded wrought iron structure – and anxious to avoid a “house of cards” effect when work started work for real – the author suggested that the team try and apply a finite element analysis to the structure.

This has now been put in hand as part of a programme instigated by the UK Government; know as a Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP). This involves Prof Chris Bailey of the University of Greenwich and his team setting up the model in conjunction with the Cutty Sark staff, which will attempt to model the degraded structure, both the timber and the iron, evaluate the loads and produce a tool, which it is hoped would be sufficiently flexible that it could be applied to other degraded structures.

10. The Way Ahead

All in all, a major amount of work has been done to ensure the work needing to be done to repair the ship and keep her intact for another century was properly costed before any work is put in hand and before being included in the next application to the lottery.

It is as nothing, however, compared with the work to be done once the team get the funds. But it is to be hoped that, as a result of all this work, the Cutty Sark will still be seen over the roofs of Greenwich for some time to come.

Photo of metal smock.

11. Acknowledgements

Richard Doughty, Chief Executive Officer, Cutty Sark Trust, 2 Greenwich Church street, Greenwich, London SE10 9BG.
Web site:

Dr Eric Kentley, Heritage Consultant, author of The Significance of Cutty Sark. 64 Bargery Road, London SE6 2LW.

S.A. Campbell and I.B. Beech
Applied Electrochemistry and Microbiology Group, University of Portsmouth, St. Michael’s Building, White Swan Road, Portsmouth PO1 2DT.
Web site:

Peter Lawton,
Hampshire County Council Museums Service,
Treadgold Industrial Heritage Museum,
Bishop Street, Portsmouth PO1 3DA.
Web site:

Chris Bailey,
Professor, Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, Greenwich, London SE10 9LS.
Web site:

Three Quays Marine Services Ltd.,
12 – 20 Camomile Street, London EC3A 7AS.
Web Site:

Frazer-Nash Consultancy Limited,
1 Trinity Street, College Green,
Bristol BS1 5TE.
Web Site:


Wyn Davies is a senior consultant with Frazer-Nash Consultancy Limited, having moved his historic ship business to that company just over a year ago. He has worked on a very wide range of historic ships including:

RRS Discovery, Scott’s Antarctic expedition ship,
ML 1387, 1943 72 ft wooden HDML,
John H Amos, Steam Paddle Tug,
X24, Midget Submarine,
SS Robin, Steam Coaster,
HMS Stalker, 1945 Landing Ship Tank 3,
HMS Trincomalee, 1817 teak built frigate,
Dunbrody, replica Irish immigrant ship, c1850,
HMS Warrior 1862, first iron battleship,
Medway Queen, 1926 paddle steamer of Dunkirk fame,
Queen Mary, 1932 Clyde turbine steamer,
HMS Cavalier, 1944 destroyer,
PS Waverley, 1947 Clyde paddle steamer,
SS Shieldhall, operational steam ship.

He is also a member of the Heritage Lottery Fund’s Directory of Expert Advisors.


BSc Aeronautical Engineering
MSc Aircraft Design
MSc Naval Architecture

Papers Presented

“The Assessment of Safety for Vessels in Service: Practical Examples of the Application of FSA Techniques from Inland Vessels to Ocean Going Ferries”, with P J Best (Frazer-Nash), I Mar E, London, 7 January 1999.

“The Preservation of Steel Warships with Particular Reference to HMS Cavalier“, with J Porter, 6th Maritime Heritage Conference, Wilmington NC 25 October 2001.


1 From “The significance of Cutty Sark“, A discussion paper by The Cutty Sark Trust October 2003

2 ibid

Copyright © 1997-2007, Historic Naval Ships Association.
All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices and Privacy Policy
Version 3.00

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s